12 May 2011
Chris Andrews - Hold On
Label: Decca
Year of Release: 1967
"Babeeee you're just tooooo much!" screeches Chris Andrews at the start of this record, before seductively uttering: "And I waaaaant you". Hearing such lines over the years has frequently made me wonder just how much self-confidence you'd need to have, either in the studio or on stage, to deliver bold sexual declarations without the slightest hint of irony.
In the context of this record, all is forgiven. "Hold On" is such a needle-into-the-red mod screecher that it seems entirely appropriate that the lyrics should essentially be a human version of a mating call. It's yet another example of a sixties record which really acts more as a declaration of sexual frustration for teenagers everywhere than a studied, lyrically thoughtful piece of work. Guitars squeal and wail, the chorus hammers itself into your cranium, Chris is so unsubtle in his delivery that he may as well be beating his chest, and its so relentless that you can only jump around along to it whether you sympathise with the bedroom related plight of Mr Andrews or not.
Of course, Chris Andrews had a successful career prior to this record, writing many of Sandie Shaw's biggest hits ("Girl Don't Come", "I'll Stop at Nothing") as well as working with The Mamas and The Papas and Adam Faith. On top of that, he'd managed hits of his own with "Yesterday Man" and "To Whom it Concerns". Despite this, his career begin to stall once the music of the period became more diverse and experimental, and like so many beat boys before him, could only watch helplessly as the flops piled up. "Hold On" was his last single for Decca who by 1967 had clearly given up all hope of him having any kind of mainstream presence again. One has to wonder whether the record was in some way nixed by the label's pessimistic attitude towards it, as "Hold On" sounds to my ears like one of his finest recordings - it's brittle, punchy and incredibly addictive, and is an astounding track to blast loudly around a room. I've yet to hear the record played once in a club, but I'd be willing to place money that any DJ who dared to spin it would get a favourable reaction.
Irrespective of my personal views, the public didn't take to it at the time, and Andrews moved to Pye Records to deliver three more flops. A comeback of sorts was attempted in 1977, but once again nobody bit, and the utterly astonishing "Nothing Less Than Brilliant" single he co-wrote with Sandie Shaw in the eighties also found little appreciation outside of late-night Radio One play. Hopefully the royalties he receives from his prime hits are enough to keep the wolf from the door - he certainly deserves the security, as many of his records are actually supremely under-rated in the UK, and he's surely due a major reappraisal soon.
Labels:
chris andrews,
sixties
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
sixties
seventies
eighties
novelty
nineties
psychedelia
The Beatles
folk
glam rock
christmas
one hit wonders
reggae
northern soul
garage
easy listening
KLF
comedy
library music
synthpop
alan blaikley
ken howard
Bill Drummond
disco
bob dylan
eurovision
mark wirtz
romo/ new romantic
Microdisney
cover versions
earl brutus
promotional items of a dubious quality
Beach Boys
Morgan Studios
Wales
animals that swim
bad taste
dora hall
embassy
roger greenaway
the bee gees
creation
elton john
BBC
C86
bob morgan
chris andrews
howard blaikley
john pantry
Eastenders
KPM
blessed ethel
Inaura
Joe Meek
Medicine Head
The Critters
brian bennett
czech rock
don crown
noel edmonds
Birdie
British Gas
Peel Sessions
Salad
Walham Green East Wapping Steam Beating Carpet Cleaning Rodent and Boggit Exterminating Association
pete the plate spinning dog
2 comments:
I'm sure Chris is doing fine on songwriting royalties alone since "Yesterday's Man" still pops up on compilations plus he seemed to be more popular in Germany than the UK. Then of course there's all the hits he wrote for Sandie. Probably set to enjoy a new boost now that Sandie is back in the limelight and touring again after a very long absence.
I do rate him as a songwriter but find his own voice somewhat grating and that's possibly a reason why he wasn't bigger than he was a solo act.
I hope he does. Given the dodginess of many sixties contracts, it's difficult to tell whether people who were successful in that period are still able to live off their royalties, but hopefully Chris Andrews did enough to be comfortable.
Post a Comment